From: Happy Camper (happy_programmer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 2002-04-30 19:06:02 UTC
Using this technique I do see a 10% improvement in CPU utilization on average. But the avg. CPU utilization of 25% on a P4 2GHz is still a cause for concern. Could this mean a potential 100% CPU utilization on a P3 500MHz?
Here is a capture of one of the top sessions during a large file download over my wireless connection that is using hostap_pci:
11:50am up 21:58, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 46 processes: 44 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: 0.0% user, 24.3% system, 0.0% nice, 75.6% idle Mem: 514136K av, 499112K used, 15024K free, 0K shrd, 81720K buff
Swap: 522104K av, 0K used, 522104K free 229980Kcached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 1 root 15 0 488 488 420 S 0.0 0.0 0:04 init 2 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd 3 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kapmd 4 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU0 5 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kswapd 6 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 bdflush 7 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kupdated 8 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 mdrecoveryd 12 root 15 0 0 0 0 DW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald 91 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 khubd 701 root 15 0 576 576 488 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 syslogd 706 root 15 0 444 444 384 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 klogd 726 rpc 15 0 540 540 460 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 portmap 754 rpcuser 17 0 708 708 612 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 rpc.statd 901 root 15 0 1212 1212 1088 S 0.0 0.2 0:00 sshd 958 root 15 0 516 516 452 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 gpm 976 root 15 0 616 616 536 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 crond 1044 xfs 15 0 5196 5196 872 S 0.0 1.0 0:00 xfs 1080 daemon 15 0 516 516 452 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 atd 1089 root 15 0 396 396 340 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 mingetty 1090 root 15 0 396 396 340 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 mingetty 1091 root 15 0 396 396 340 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 mingetty 1092 root 15 0 396 396 340 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 mingetty 2364 root 22 0 444 444 388 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 dhcpcd 2473 root 18 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 msp3410...
Atif