From: Xam R. Time (xam_at_chalupa.wi2600.org)
Date: 2002-09-02 14:04:04 UTC
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Ted Phelps wrote:
> Kevin Matthews may have said:
> > 20:41:06.108198 arp reply 192.168.0.3 is-at 0:3:2f:0:c5:d9
> > 20:41:16.109242 arp who-has 192.168.0.3 tell 192.168.0.4
> > 20:41:16.109249 arp reply 192.168.0.3 is-at 0:3:2f:0:c5:d9
> That looks healthy. At least two computers are able to exchange
> information via your wireless link.
Heh, no, I can assure you that's not healthy. The issue is that he should not see more than a WHO-HAS and a single, directed IS-AT reply. Obviously there are >1 replies shown, so something is borked.
> Possibly this is simply a routing problem? Could you tell us what
> netstat -r says? And which machines 192.168.0.3 and 192.168.0.4 are?
ARP is not routed, period.